Boris Zbarsky wrote: > ... > All else being equal, yes. But letting theoretical purity > considerations stand in the way of something useful when the purity is > already being violated in the real world right and left seems a little > odd to me... > > Of course maybe you have a counterproposal that satisfies you, and I > just missed it. Is that the case? > ... I currently don't have a good proposal. What I'm asking for is: a) that FF3 does not ship with this feature being turned on, unless it implements the current "should"-level requirement with respect to the UI, b) that the HTML-WG considers not using POST for now. Of course the more general question is whether the HTML5 spec is the right place for this kind of controversial experimentation. BR, Julian PS: with respect to b), another argument against the current way POST is used is that the HTTP message is not self-descriptive, so minimally a MIME type should be defined (which would also open the possibility to send the link target in the body).Received on Saturday, 10 November 2007 11:41:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:23 UTC