- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:11:17 -0600
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTML WG List <public-html@w3.org>
Mark Baker wrote: > That sounds like "safe". "idempotent", for a message, means that any > series of identical messages means the same as just one. OK. Let's start here, since we seem to have some agreement on this. Can we agree that for ping a series of identical messages is NOT in fact the same as just one? And that therefore ping is not idempotent? -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 05:12:00 UTC