W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Getting started with issue tracking

From: Shawn Medero <soypunk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 20:19:44 -0400
Message-ID: <994fc8d00711021719k20ff99d7h1ea58dc42a7db435@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "HTML Issue Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>

On 11/2/07, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

> Question: Is there a way to distinguish issues that are in the following
> states?:
>  * Newly added
>  * Written in the format described in the template and e-mails above
>  * Read, considered, and handled by the editors
>  * Closed

According to the current Tracker feature set, _no_:

"Very simple schema. Actions have a title and a due date and are
assigned to a single Working Group member. Issues have a title, a
description and are related to a product. Issues can only have two
states (OPEN and CLOSED)."

Though the planned features suggest it is on the way:

"More states for issues - allow issues and actions to be in more
states than simply OPEN and CLOSED. (Note that I'm hesitant to do this
because the CDF group have had a lot of success with only the binary

I'll ping the Systeam and see what the status of this feature is.

I sorta like the minimalism+immediacy of OPEN vs. CLOSED but I do wish
there was a way that arbitrary keywords could be applied to an issue.

Received on Saturday, 3 November 2007 00:19:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:23 UTC