Re: Format for type attribute value

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Well, that's to true anymore, as RFC2048 has been obsoleted by RFC4288, 
> and the latter one defines many methods to register types without a 
> standards-track RFC (it may have been incorrect even for RFC2048).
> ...


BR, Julian

Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 14:12:00 UTC