- From: Adam van den Hoven <adam.vandenhoven@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:22:27 -0800
- To: HTML WG List <public-html@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On 8-Nov-07, at 12:02 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: >> ... >> I agree that a new method would be better. I'm not sure it is a >> feasible solution, though, given the high cost (in terms of spec >> development and server development and deployment) of a new method. >> We can't just invent a new method; not withstanding that we'd get >> quickly stoned, we'd also not soon be able to implement it server >> side (e.g. in Apache). >> ... > > I'm not going to say that a new method is needed (a I still think > GET is fine). But I also think that you're overestimating the cost > of introducing new methods. For this purpose, analyzing the log file > would be completely sufficient, right? Actually its only in the simplest of implementations that log analysis is fine. We use a commercial analytics system and it does a LOT more than simply analyse he log. > BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:26:25 UTC