- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:17:16 +0900
- To: Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Le 29 nov. 2007 à 14:42, Dean Edridge a écrit : > The http://www.google.com/ main page is not a very big file. > Changing it to a more interoperable/universal syntax would not make > it that much larger and would not be the end of the world. Other > Websites do not have problems conforming to a stricter standard. Plus the fact that valid doesn't mean bigger. :) but that's unrelated. The initial argument of Ian was moot. Anyhow, the result is a valid HTML 4.01 Strict file that is 3 902 bytes large. Google’s invalid kinda-HTML 2.something very-loose is 4 944 bytes. The valid and strict version is 1 042 bytes smaller. That’s 21 percent savings on bandwidth costs. http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200608/google_valid_and_strict/ -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 07:17:25 UTC