Le 29 nov. 2007 à 14:42, Dean Edridge a écrit : > The http://www.google.com/ main page is not a very big file. > Changing it to a more interoperable/universal syntax would not make > it that much larger and would not be the end of the world. Other > Websites do not have problems conforming to a stricter standard. Plus the fact that valid doesn't mean bigger. :) but that's unrelated. The initial argument of Ian was moot. Anyhow, the result is a valid HTML 4.01 Strict file that is 3 902 bytes large. Google’s invalid kinda-HTML 2.something very-loose is 4 944 bytes. The valid and strict version is 1 042 bytes smaller. That’s 21 percent savings on bandwidth costs. http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200608/google_valid_and_strict/ -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be CoolReceived on Thursday, 29 November 2007 07:17:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:24 UTC