Julian, >> JR> My experience is that most people do understand the difference between a >> JR> link and a button. >> JR> Also, the fact that it's possible to *obscure* that isn't a good >> JR> argument in favor of adding more stuff like this. On the contrary, we >> JR> should educate web designers that it's a bad thing to make something >> JR> look like a link when it isn't. >> I'm sure, that the best variant, when <a> behaves similar <form>. >> I'm sure. >> But this can require unification of HTTP for both cases. JR> Uh? Are you saying you want to make GET and POST be the same? Yes, definitively. Moreover, I definitively want, that <a> and <form> send similar traffic (i.e. message of identical template). What's about bookmark in browsers, this is deal of browser instead of address-line in them. P.S. Moreover once again: I definitively want XML as communication protocol instead of HTTP. Dmitry Turin HTML6 (6.5.0) http://html60.euro.ru SQL5 (5.7.0) http://sql50.euro.ru Unicode7 (7.2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru Computer2 (2.0.2) http://computer20.euro.ruReceived on Friday, 9 November 2007 14:43:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:23 UTC