On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Sam Ruby wrote: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > > We should interpret the charter as covering all reasonable application > > and document features. Otherwise, we will have to recharter every time > > someone realizes we are missing important functionality that doesn't > > already have a detailed line item in the charter. > > Such a charter interpretation creates a good chance of HTML5 never being > complete. There are a lot of ideas that somebody out there considers > reasonable. And next year, there will be more. I don't think that's a real danger. We can always say "no". Indeed, that has been the default answer to almost all proposals since work on HTML5 started in 2003/2004; an idea usually has to have a lot of demand to get beyond the proposal stage. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 21:59:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:24 UTC