Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue

On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> > 
> > We should interpret the charter as covering all reasonable application 
> > and document features. Otherwise, we will have to recharter every time 
> > someone realizes we are missing important functionality that doesn't 
> > already have a detailed line item in the charter.
> Such a charter interpretation creates a good chance of HTML5 never being 
> complete.  There are a lot of ideas that somebody out there considers 
> reasonable.  And next year, there will be more.

I don't think that's a real danger. We can always say "no". Indeed, that 
has been the default answer to almost all proposals since work on HTML5 
started in 2003/2004; an idea usually has to have a lot of demand to get 
beyond the proposal stage.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 21:59:26 UTC