- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:05:44 +0900
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>, Roger Johansson <roger@456bereastreet.com>
Le 21 nov. 2007 à 16:42, Henri Sivonen a écrit : > It is, however, questionable whether such subset should be published > by the W3C at all Not at all. The Web designers community which is part of this HTML WG will have to decide of this. > I think a document published by the W3C for authors shouldn't subset > what the spec proper defines as the conforming language, but it can > opt to use a single convention for its examples. I leave this decision to Web designers, Web developers, not implementers. :) > A document explaining the language to authors has no business > banning elements that the spec proper allows. (The example given is > already banned by the spec proper.) Same answers. Not my decision, nor yours. > "Kevin: The best practices when the Zen Garden came out are not the > same as they are today." It's why a wiki can be a solution. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 10:05:54 UTC