- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:15:20 -0800
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Nov 29, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > The DOM and other features you mention are part of our charter > deliverables, so it would not make sense to remove them from the spec. Not all deliverables need to be in a single spec. What does need to be in the spec is a definition of HTML that does not require a DOM, because MOST implementations of HTML processing do not have a DOM. >> The problem with publishing it is simply that the title is wrong. >> It will mislead a lot of developers who are looking for a definition >> of HTML and find, instead, a lot of half-baked ideas about how a >> browser should compose a DOM, reinterpret HTTP, make useless >> requests, >> and a lot of other things you've added to enshrine browser bugs. >> It is not HTML5 by any stretch of the imagination. > > We already made a group decision that the spec title would be > HTML5. The vote was overwhelmingly in favor. We could certainly > revisit that old decision, but I seriously doubt it would go the > other way. I don't think it is reasonable to hold the FPWD hostage > to getting your way on the title. I was not here for that vote, I don't generally vote based on what the working group thinks (just what I think), and my vote does not hold anything hostage. [Dan was correct in not highlighting it as an issue because it is not a formal objection.] I only mention it because Ian brought it up. >> Call it "Uniform Browser Behavior for the Web" and my informal >> objection is waived. > > As an aside, I don't think your proposed title is accurate. The > spec covers many conformance classes besides browsers, including > documents, editors, validators, and non-browser implementations. If > you wanted to call it "HTML Syntax, Semantics and Behavior for > Browsers, Documents, Editors, Validators, and Other Implementations > 5", then that would be accurate but I think pretty long-winded. The spec covers everything, which is the problem. HTML is not everything. HTML is a declarative data format for the interoperable exchange of hypertext. ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 23:15:43 UTC