www-ws-desc@w3.org from October 2003 by author

Amelia A. Lewis

• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Regrets for 30 October 2003 telcon (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: writing up faults and q about fault rules (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Wednesday, 22 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Wednesday, 22 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• Re: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule (Thursday, 9 October)
• On include (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Three patterns using the ruleset "Message Triggers Fault" (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Wednesday, 1 October)
• Re: pattern URIs (was: Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF) (Wednesday, 1 October)

Anne Thomas Manes

• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Saturday, 25 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Saturday, 25 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Saturday, 25 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Saturday, 18 October)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• Re: examples in spec? (Friday, 3 October)

Bijan Parsia

• Regrets Oct 16 and Oct 23 (Wednesday, 15 October)

Bob Cunnings

• RE: parameter order (Tuesday, 28 October)

Champion, Mike

• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Sunday, 26 October)

Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)

• RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web se rv ices (Wednesday, 1 October)

David Booth

• Wording of Part1 2.3.1.1 Operation Style (Thursday, 9 October)
• Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: Three patterns using the ruleset "Message Triggers Fault" (Thursday, 9 October)

David Orchard

• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 31 October)
• RE: [rev 1] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Thursday, 30 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Thursday, 30 October)
• RE: examples in spec? (Friday, 3 October)
• RE: on "wsdlLocation" (Thursday, 2 October)

FABLET Youenn

• Minutes 23 Oct 2003 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 28 October)

Glen Daniels

• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 31 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 31 October)
• Re: Attributes in WSDL (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop set-attribute and get-attribute operation styles (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: Extensions and profiles (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Thursday, 30 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 27 October)
• Features and Properties musings (Thursday, 23 October)

Hal Lockhart

• RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web se rv ices (Wednesday, 1 October)

Jacek Kopecky

• Extensions and profiles (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Friday, 24 October)
• Draft minutes of Oct 2 telcon (Friday, 3 October)
• RE: comments on Appendix E (Wednesday, 1 October)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Intermediaries (Friday, 31 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 31 October)
• Re: [rev 1] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 21 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: examples in spec? (Friday, 3 October)
• Re: examples in spec? (Friday, 3 October)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Friday, 24 October)

Jeffrey Schlimmer

• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 31 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 31 October)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Friday, 31 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 31 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Saturday, 25 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Saturday, 25 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Thursday, 23 October)
• RE: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: new issue: drop {direction} property from message reference components (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: on "wsdlLocation" (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: On WSDL "operation" (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: "Bulk load" get/set (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: "Bulk load" get/set (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: "Bulk load" get/set (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: pattern URIs (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• RE: new issue: drop {direction} property from message reference components (Thursday, 2 October)

Jim Murphy

• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Thursday, 23 October)

Jim Webber

• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Tuesday, 28 October)

Jonathan Marsh

• Minutes, 30 Oct 2003 WS Desc telcon (Saturday, 1 November)
• RE: RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Friday, 31 October)
• RE: RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Friday, 31 October)
• [rev 2] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Thursday, 30 October)
• RE: Agenda, 30 October 2003 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Agenda, 30 October 2003 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 29 October)
• [rev 1] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Tuesday, 28 October)
• [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Thursday, 23 October)
• Agenda, 23 October 2003 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 22 October)
• RE: Minutes, 24 Sept 2003 WS Desc WG FTF (Wednesday, 22 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Wednesday, 22 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Wednesday, 22 October)
• Minutes 16 Oct 2003 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 22 October)
• Agenda, 16 October 2003 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 14 October)
• Minutes: 9 October 2003 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 14 October)
• Agenda, 9 October 2003 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 7 October)

Lawrence Mandel

• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Thursday, 16 October)

Lily Liu

• Regrets for 10/02/2003 telcon (Wednesday, 1 October)

Liu, Kevin

• Oct 16 call - Regret (Wednesday, 15 October)

Mark Baker

• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: Agenda, 30 October 2003 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Sunday, 26 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Sunday, 26 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Friday, 24 October)
• New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Friday, 24 October)
• What does WSDL describe? (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Tuesday, 21 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Tuesday, 21 October)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inli ne schema? (Thursday, 23 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Wednesday, 22 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Sunday, 19 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Saturday, 18 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Saturday, 18 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule (Thursday, 9 October)

Michael Champion

• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)

Patrick.Hung@csiro.au

• Web Services Privacy Issues in WSDL and SOAP (Friday, 17 October)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Thursday, 30 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Thursday, 23 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Thursday, 23 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Tuesday, 21 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Tuesday, 21 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Tuesday, 21 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 21 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Sunday, 19 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Three patterns using the ruleset "Message Triggers Fault" (Tuesday, 14 October)
• RE: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule (Thursday, 9 October)
• RE: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule (Thursday, 9 October)
• RE: examples in spec? (Friday, 3 October)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Tuesday, 28 October)

Roberto Chinnici

• Parameter order resurrected (Saturday, 1 November)
• Counterproposal for service references (Friday, 31 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: parameter order (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Tuesday, 21 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 21 October)
• Re: revised fault proposal (Friday, 3 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Friday, 3 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Wednesday, 1 October)
• Re: pattern URIs (Wednesday, 1 October)

Sandeep Kumar

• Regrets for Telcon Oct 30, 2003 (Thursday, 30 October)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• PROPOSAL: Short-cut syntax for in-out and in-only patterns (Friday, 31 October)
• Re: RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Friday, 31 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 31 October)
• PROPOSAL: Drop set-attribute and get-attribute operation styles (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: parameter order (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RPC 80/20 split (was: Re: RPC Style Issues (3)) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• parameter order (was: Re: RPC Style Issues (3)) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• quoting properly (was: Re: RPC Style Issues (3)) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• http binding (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• spec part1 update complete (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Monday, 27 October)
• asynch/one-way (was: Re: What does WSDL describe?) (Sunday, 26 October)
• writing up faults and q about fault rules (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Thursday, 23 October)
• minutes for yesterday's call? (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Thursday, 23 October)
• PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• Fw: cvs commits to 2002/ws/desc (Friday, 3 October)
• revised fault proposal (Friday, 3 October)
• Re: examples in spec? (Friday, 3 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Friday, 3 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• examples in spec? (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: new issue: drop {direction} property from message reference components (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: pattern URIs (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Wednesday, 1 October)
• Re: proposal for faults (Wednesday, 1 October)

Savas Parastatidis

• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Sunday, 26 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Sunday, 26 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Thursday, 23 October)

Sergey Beryozkin

• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: http binding (Wednesday, 29 October)

Steve Graham

• Attributes in WSDL (Thursday, 30 October)

Tom Jordahl

• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop set-attribute and get-attribute operation styl es (Thursday, 30 October)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 27 October)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: Minutes 16 Oct 2003 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 23 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Thursday, 23 October)
• RE: proposal for faults (Friday, 3 October)
• RE: examples in spec? (Friday, 3 October)

Umit Yalcinalp

• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: parameter order (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: parameter order (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Monday, 27 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: What does WSDL describe? (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Tuesday, 21 October)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers (Tuesday, 21 October)
• Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema? (Friday, 17 October)
• Re: Wording of Part1 2.3.1.1 Operation Style (Thursday, 9 October)
• RPC Style Issues (3) (Thursday, 9 October)
• RPC Style Issues Part (2) (Thursday, 9 October)
• RPC Style Issues Part (1) (Thursday, 9 October)

UMIT.YALCINALP@ORACLE.COM

• Re: RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Friday, 31 October)

VAMBENEPE,WILLIAM (HP-Cupertino,ex1)

• Completion of AI from attributes task force (Thursday, 30 October)
• RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0 (Sunday, 26 October)
• RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inli ne schema? (Thursday, 23 October)

Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2003 19:26:05 UTC