W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2003

RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:30:07 -0800
Message-ID: <DDE1793D7266AD488BB4F5E8D38EACB8038DC870@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

> From: Glen Daniels
>
> If you, the user, are actually putting particular values into headers,
and
> you expect to "know" what the semantically appropriate values are, you
> should NOT be using the "headers" syntax, or anything like it.  You
should
> be using a syntax which says "use this SOAP module".  Why?  Because
the
> "headers" syntax is completely inadequate for any but the most basic
> (always
> send this particular header) extensions, whereas the module syntax
allows
> for anything that the spec defines.

Along this dimension, wow does identifying a GED for a header block
differ from defining a GED for the Body?

--Jeff
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 20:30:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT