RE: "Bulk load" get/set

+1

(Since all these people are saying the same thing, I really couldn't
decide who I agreed with most!) 

> Tom Jordahl wrote:
> 
> I will go on record as saying that while attributes seem like a useful
> concept, I do no think they need to be part of WSDL.  They can easily
be
> modeled in an interface, and the extension mechanism (aka interface
> inheritance) we now have makes it very simple to define a set of
> attributes that apply to a particular interface.