W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2003

RE: PROPOSAL: Drop set-attribute and get-attribute operation styl es

From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:29:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CB1FF0A474AEA84EA0206D5B05F6A4CB04C52914@S1001EXM02.macromedia.com>
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

+1

I support the proposal to drop the set/get-attribute operation styles.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:23 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: PROPOSAL: Drop set-attribute and get-attribute operation styles


I'd like to propose that we drop the set-attribute and get-attribute
operation styles.

This is motivated by a change in how IBM views the relationship
between state and services. In the past, we had envisioned a 
rather tight or close relationship between a service and the
state it may manipulate. We've evolved our thinking on that and
now believe that services may operate on one or more resources,
but that the service and the resources (state) it operates on are
inherently distinct entities. 

Based on this, the approach for attributes that we advocated before
does not make sense or is at best unnecessary. We no longer see
the need for it and do not intend to support them. We believe
there are better ways to express the metadata about the 
resources the service manipulates.

We also believe that the new refined view of the relationship
between services and resources needs to be reflected in the 
attribute user community, in particular GGF and WSDM. We're
working to do that via our reps in those groups.

Sanjiva.
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2003 15:28:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT