W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2003

RE: http binding

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:07:02 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF05E20108@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I recently saw a SOAP/HTTP service which used a query string in the URL to provide routing and security parameters and POST to exchange SOAP documents 

- should WSDL allow, bar or ignore this combination of GET and POST ?

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
Sent: 29 October 2003 11:05
To: Jean-Jacques Moreau
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: http binding



I think the removal of <message> offers interesting possibilities
for a "direct" HTTP POST binding. I'd like to explore that.

I'd like to define an HTTP GET binding for RPC style operations.

Finally, we need to sort out the SOAP Response MEP stuff. 

So maybe there isn't much difference, but we need to get it all 
done. I don't expect there will be a MIME binding at all, but to
be honest have not thought about how MTOM bindings may work. 

Bye,

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: http binding


> How different would that be from the text that went in last time (apart 
> from component model issues)?
> 
> JJ.
> 
> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> 
> > I'd like to see us make some progress on the HTTP bindings too.
> > I've been thinking about this for a while, even though I haven't
> > put anything down on paper yet. However, I do have 20 hrs of
> > sitting in planes to do just that. 
> > 
> > Can we get some time to discuss it at the F2F? I don't think
> > there'll be enough to make decisions, but I'd like to get 
> > people thinking on how we may want to evolve the HTTP stuff.
> > 
> > Philippe, I know you've had a long standing action item on
> > this .. I'm not trying to take that over (sorry for appearing 
> > to do so though, especially without asking), but I would like
> > to make progress on it. If you have anything that you can send
> > with your thoughts on it (before Saturday night my time - Sat
> > AM yours) then I can go thru that too while writing down what
> > I have in mind.
> > 
> > Sanjiva.
> >
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 06:07:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT