How different would that be from the text that went in last time (apart from component model issues)? JJ. Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > I'd like to see us make some progress on the HTTP bindings too. > I've been thinking about this for a while, even though I haven't > put anything down on paper yet. However, I do have 20 hrs of > sitting in planes to do just that. > > Can we get some time to discuss it at the F2F? I don't think > there'll be enough to make decisions, but I'd like to get > people thinking on how we may want to evolve the HTTP stuff. > > Philippe, I know you've had a long standing action item on > this .. I'm not trying to take that over (sorry for appearing > to do so though, especially without asking), but I would like > to make progress on it. If you have anything that you can send > with your thoughts on it (before Saturday night my time - Sat > AM yours) then I can go thru that too while writing down what > I have in mind. > > Sanjiva. >Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 05:21:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:40 GMT