On Tuesday, Oct 28, 2003, at 21:13 America/Detroit, Mark Baker wrote: > > I think you need to re-read my proposal, Sanjiva. I'm totally > against renaming too. I'm saying we need *both* "operation" and > "exchange". > > And the WG members are saying, if I am seeing this correctly from a distance, that WSDL is not committed to either an "interface/option model" or a "state exchange model." Terminology aside, it's just about messages and interaction patterns; those messages may describe operations or state exchange, but those semantics are outside the scope of WSDL.Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:32:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT