W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2003

RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:50:07 -0800
Message-ID: <DDE1793D7266AD488BB4F5E8D38EACB8038DC8B7@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "Anne Thomas Manes" <anne@manes.net>, "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


> From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:anne@manes.net]
> 
> While I agree with you, I'm certain that WS-I will define a constraint
> that
> wire signatures must be unique.

The future may not resemble the past.

Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 20:50:12 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sanjiva Weerawarana: "Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0"
Previous message: Jeffrey Schlimmer: "RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers"
Maybe in reply to: Umit Yalcinalp: "Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0"
Next in thread: Sanjiva Weerawarana: "Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0"
Reply: Sanjiva Weerawarana: "Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT