W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2003

Re: examples in spec?

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:43:11 -0400
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF3F60C972.299155D4-ON85256DB4.004544A8@ca.ibm.com>
I find illustrative examples very helpful in understanding specs. I think 
the spec should contain short examples for each construct. The spec should 
be self-contained, i.e. not require you to refer to the primer. The primer 
should contain an extended example and perhaps clarify subtle features.

Arthur Ryman

"Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
10/03/2003 05:29 AM

        To:     Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
        cc:     www-ws-desc@w3.org
        Subject:        Re: examples in spec?

My recollection is that most examples would be in the primer, Part 1 & 3 
containing only a small number of introductory examples.


Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

> I remember we discussed the idea of including some examples
> (more likely example fragments) in the spec(s). What was the
> final verdict?
> Sanjiva.
Received on Friday, 3 October 2003 08:43:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:44 UTC