W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2003

RE: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:14:29 -0700
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA2018D9FC6@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I'm with Sanjiva in not grasping this issue.  Is this just a fancy way
to ask whether message signatures should be unique on the wire (an issue
which we are already debating)?  I don't see any difference between a
SOAP body of <state>12345</state> and <add>12345</add> from the WSDL
processor point of view, though they may imply different application
semantics.

 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Amelia A. Lewis
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 8:08 AM
> To: Mark Baker
> Cc: sanjiva@watson.ibm.com; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
> 
> 
> Perhaps this could be summarized as:
> 
> ISSUE: should WSDL operations be restricted to state transfer only?
> 
> Amy!
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:19:08 -0400
> Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:37:48PM +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > > Can you succinctly state the issue please? I don't to wade thru
> > > this thread and figure out something else.
> >
> > I tried, but I couldn't do any better than this;
> >
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Oct/0146.html
> >
> > Mark.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
> 
Received on Friday, 24 October 2003 11:14:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT