RE: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule from paul.downey@bt.com on 2003-10-09 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from October 2003)

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:42:24 +0100
To: <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Cc: <alewis@tibco.com>
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF0FFF1C49@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>

How about:

  "The fault message MUST be *sent* to the same target node as the message it replaces." 

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: David Booth [mailto:dbooth@w3.org]
Sent: 09 October 2003 07:47
To: WS Description List
Cc: Amelia A. Lewis
Subject: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule



I think there is a problem with the "Fault Replaces Message" rule[1] in 
that it *requires* the fault to be sent, which may not always be possible 
when something has gone wrong.

1. http://tinyurl.com/qa43 , which forwards to 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-patterns.html#fault-replacement


-- 
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273

Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:44:19 UTC