W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Wording of Part1 2.3.1.1 Operation Style

From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:34:21 -0700
Message-ID: <3F857FFD.4090000@oracle.com>
To: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org



David Booth wrote:

>
> I have a small follow up suggestion to the wording of Part1, sec 2.3.1.1.
>
> 2.3.1.1 Operation Style says:
>
> [[
> If the {style} property of an Interface Operation component has a 
> value then that value (a URI) implies the rules that were used to 
> define the {body} properties of all {message reference}s within that 
> component. Note that the property MAY not have any value. If this 
> property has a given value, then the rules implied by that value (URI) 
> MUST be followed. Furthermore, this property represents an OPTIONAL 
> hint to additional information which MAY be ignored by a processor.
> ]]
>
> I suggest deleting the last sentence, i.e., "Furthermore, this 
> property represents an OPTIONAL hint to additional information which 
> MAY be ignored by a processor.".  I think that sentence adds more 
> confusion than clarity, because the previous sentence says "MUST" and 
> this sentence says "OPTIONAL".
>
> Why isn't that sentence needed? Because the sentence is talking about 
> what a processor may *do* with the information it gets from a 
> conforming WSDL document, which is not our business say.  In other 
> words, there is no need to say that a processor is free to ignore some 
> particular information in a conforming WSDL document, because a 
> processor is *always* free to ignore information that it doesn't 
> need.  We can define what it means for a WSDL document to *be* 
> conformant, but we cannot dictate what processors *do* when presented 
> with conforming WSDL documents.  That's up to them.
>
>
David,

See the concrete proposal for clarifying this confusion in our proposal 
by explicitly indication what is normative and required [1]. I believe 
dividing the rules into two groups would help in this direction.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Oct/0057.html

--umit

-- 
Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
ORACLE
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          
Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 11:34:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT