W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2003

Re: pattern URIs

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:33:35 +0600
Message-ID: <009101c388e9$c9645860$72545ecb@lankabook2>
To: "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

"Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com> writes:
> 
> I don't see the distinction here between behavior for 'normative'
> patterns and 'non-normative' patterns. A WSDL processor is not required
> to recognize any patterns, but if it does recognize one of the patterns
> we define, it must follow the semantics as specified.

I agree. We are just defining a set of pattern URIs and then 
defining some bindings that work for some of them. Now, pragmatically
I imagine all processors will support the two basic inbound patterns
as well but that doesn't mean we need to make those normative and
the others not.

> Are we going to start saying that a WSDL processor must recognize all
> bindings? WSDL 1.1 didn't do that, and the community seems to have voted
> with their implementations.

+1

Sanjiva.
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 09:34:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT