RE: What does WSDL describe?

Savas wrote:
> I totally agree that WSDL is lame, as it should be. It's just a contract
> between two parties on the structure of the messages being exchange.

+1 

> Then, could you, please, remind me why we need attributes in WSDL? What
> do they add in your above description?

+2!  :-)


--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development