W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2003

RE: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:48:29 -0700
Message-ID: <7C083876C492EB4BAAF6B3AE0732970E0CE0F633@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Cc: <alewis@tibco.com>

In order to mitigate denial of service attacks one does not want to
REQUIRE that fault messages be sent at all. SOAP was very careful to say
'generate a fault' rather than 'send a fault message'

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of paul.downey@bt.com
> Sent: 09 October 2003 15:42
> To: dbooth@w3.org; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Cc: alewis@tibco.com
> Subject: RE: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule
> 
> 
> How about:
> 
>   "The fault message MUST be *sent* to the same target node 
> as the message it replaces." 
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Booth [mailto:dbooth@w3.org]
> Sent: 09 October 2003 07:47
> To: WS Description List
> Cc: Amelia A. Lewis
> Subject: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule
> 
> 
> 
> I think there is a problem with the "Fault Replaces Message" 
> rule[1] in that it *requires* the fault to be sent, which may 
> not always be possible when something has gone wrong.
> 
> 1. http://tinyurl.com/qa43 , which forwards to 
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12
> -patterns.html#fault-replacement
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 11:50:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT