"Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org> writes: > > WSDL is currently committed to an "interface/operation" model. I'm > asking that it be augmented to support alternative models such as the > one Savas describes. "operation" in WSDL 2.0 is a way of grouping together a set of messages. There is *no* semantic beyond that any more. Can you explain what the difference between that and Savas' model is please? Please use something non-committal like "foo" for <operation> so that we can talk rationally without having mental connotations on what these words mean. Sanjiva.Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:32:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT