www-tag@w3.org from February 2009: by thread

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Friday, 27 February)

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Shane McCarron (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny (Friday, 27 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Friday, 27 February)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 28 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Saturday, 28 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Saturday, 28 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Robert J Burns (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Saturday, 28 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Saturday, 28 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Saturday, 28 February)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Saturday, 28 February)

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton (Friday, 27 February)

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Phil Archer (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Karl Dubost (Friday, 27 February)

Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 February)

Re: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Shane McCarron (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)

Fwd: FYI: Link -04 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 25 February)

Re: Fwd: FYI: Link -04 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
- Re: Fwd: FYI: Link -04 Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 25 February)
  - Re: FYI: Link -04 Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 26 February)

Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 25 February)

Re: Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 25 February)
- Re: Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
  - Re: Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) Jonathan Rees (Thursday, 26 February)
    - Re: Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 26 February)

Stuart Williams comments in TAG ISSUE-57 (httpRedirections-57) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 25 February)

"Content-Type Processing Model" draft 9 Jan (ISSUE-24 contentTypeOverride-24) Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 24 February)

Re: "Content-Type Processing Model" draft 9 Jan (ISSUE-24 contentTypeOverride-24) Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: "Content-Type Processing Model" draft 9 Jan (ISSUE-24 contentTypeOverride-24) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 24 February)

Metadata survey Jonathan Rees (Tuesday, 24 February)

Re: Metadata survey Phil Archer (Tuesday, 24 February)

What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 Martin Nally (Tuesday, 24 February)

RE: What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Wednesday, 25 February)
- RE: What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 Martin Nally (Wednesday, 25 February)
  - RE: What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Wednesday, 25 February)

Draft Minutes of the TAG Teleconference of 19 February 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Monday, 23 February)

Re: Draft Minutes of the TAG Teleconference of 19 February 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 24 February)

http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Dan Connolly (Monday, 23 February)

Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Cullen Jennings (Monday, 23 February)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Dan Connolly (Monday, 23 February)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Thomas Roessler (Monday, 23 February)
  - Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Cullen Jennings (Monday, 23 February)
    - Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Thomas Roessler (Monday, 23 February)
      - Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Cullen Jennings (Tuesday, 24 February)
        
        RE: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Larry Masinter (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Eran Hammer-Lahav (Monday, 23 February)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Tim Berners-Lee (Tuesday, 24 February)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Cullen Jennings (Tuesday, 24 February)
  - Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 24 February)

No TAG Teleconference on 26 February 2009 -- suggestions for F2F preparation noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Monday, 23 February)

Using Content Negotiation to relate "data resources" to AJAX user interfaces Martin Nally (Friday, 20 February)

RE: Using Content Negotiation to relate "data resources" to AJAX user interfaces Sebastien Lambla (Tuesday, 24 February)
- RE: Using Content Negotiation to relate "data resources" to AJAX user interfaces Martin Nally (Tuesday, 24 February)

Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' Michael Hausenblas (Thursday, 19 February)

Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' Jonathan Rees (Thursday, 19 February)
- Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' Michael Hausenblas (Thursday, 19 February)
  - Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' Jonathan Rees (Friday, 20 February)
Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' Richard Cyganiak (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' Xiaoshu Wang (Friday, 20 February)
- Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' Dan Brickley (Friday, 20 February)
  - Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' Xiaoshu Wang (Friday, 20 February)
    - Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' Dan Brickley (Friday, 20 February)
    - content negotiation in HTTP Larry Masinter (Tuesday, 24 February)

Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data ashok malhotra (Wednesday, 18 February)

Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Martin Nally (Wednesday, 18 February)
- Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data ashok malhotra (Wednesday, 18 February)

Approved minutes of TAG Teleconference of 5 February 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 18 February)

Approved minutes of TAG Teleconference of 22 January 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 18 February)

RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 18 February)

Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 19 February 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 17 February)

Re: Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 19 February 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 17 February)

google supports on rel="canonical" ISSUE-27 rel-ownership Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 17 February)

Re: google supports on rel="canonical" ISSUE-27 rel-ownership Shane McCarron (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: google supports on rel="canonical" ISSUE-27 rel-ownership Phil Archer (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: google, Microsoft, Yahoo support rel="canonical" Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 18 February)

ISSUE-50: Please provide a status update on the URNS & Registries Issue noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 17 February)

Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document John Kemp (Tuesday, 17 February)

RE: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document Larry Masinter (Tuesday, 17 February)
- Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document David Orchard (Tuesday, 17 February)
  - Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 17 February)
    - Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document John Kemp (Tuesday, 17 February)
      - Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 17 February)
        
        Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document John Kemp (Wednesday, 18 February)
        
        Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document David Orchard (Wednesday, 18 February)
        
        Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 19 February)
        Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document John Kemp (Thursday, 19 February)

Palm webOS approach to HTML extensibility: x-mojo-* [issue-51 selfDescribingWeb-51] Dan Connolly (Monday, 16 February)

Re: Palm webOS approach to HTML extensibility: x-mojo-* [issue-51 selfDescribingWeb-51] Paul Prescod (Monday, 16 February)

TAG minutes 12 Feb for review: March meeting planning, metadata, WS-RA, link maintenance Dan Connolly (Friday, 13 February)

FW: I-D Action:draft-hammer-discovery-02.txt Eran Hammer-Lahav (Friday, 13 February)

a little help with my trip to the March TAG meeting? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 12 February)

Re: a little help with my trip to the March TAG meeting? Jonathan Rees (Sunday, 15 February)

Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Michael Hausenblas (Thursday, 12 February)

Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Dan Brickley (Thursday, 12 February)
RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Thursday, 12 February)
- Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Michael Hausenblas (Thursday, 12 February)
- Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Xiaoshu Wang (Thursday, 12 February)
  - RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Thursday, 12 February)
    - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Xiaoshu Wang (Thursday, 12 February)
      - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Dan Brickley (Thursday, 12 February)
      - RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Friday, 13 February)
        
        Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Xiaoshu Wang (Friday, 13 February)
        
        RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Friday, 13 February)
        Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Xiaoshu Wang (Friday, 13 February)
        RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Friday, 13 February)
        Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Xiaoshu Wang (Friday, 13 February)
- Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Jonathan Rees (Thursday, 12 February)
  - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Xiaoshu Wang (Thursday, 12 February)
  - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Ian Davis (Friday, 13 February)
- Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Ian Davis (Friday, 13 February)
  - RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Friday, 13 February)
    - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Ian Davis (Friday, 13 February)
      - RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Friday, 13 February)
  - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Michael Hausenblas (Friday, 13 February)
    - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Jonathan Rees (Friday, 13 February)
      - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Michael Hausenblas (Friday, 13 February)
      - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Xiaoshu Wang (Monday, 16 February)
        
        Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Michael Hausenblas (Tuesday, 17 February)
    - RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Friday, 13 February)
      - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Michael Hausenblas (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 18 February)
- Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data ashok malhotra (Wednesday, 18 February)
  - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 18 February)
- Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Michael Hausenblas (Wednesday, 18 February)
  - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 18 February)
    - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 18 February)
      - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 18 February)
  - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 18 February)
    - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Michael Hausenblas (Wednesday, 18 February)
    - Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Xiaoshu Wang (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Toby A Inkster (Wednesday, 18 February)

broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Larry Masinter (Thursday, 12 February)

Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Story Henry (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Julian Reschke (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Dan Connolly (Thursday, 12 February)
- Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress (Thursday, 12 February)
  - Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Julian Reschke (Thursday, 12 February)
    - Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Thomas Roessler (Thursday, 12 February)
    - Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 12 February)
      - Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Julian Reschke (Thursday, 12 February)
        
        Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Mark Baker (Thursday, 12 February)
        
        RE: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Larry Masinter (Thursday, 12 February)
        Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Pat Hayes (Thursday, 19 February)
        RE: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Larry Masinter (Thursday, 19 February)
        Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Pat Hayes (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations John Kemp (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress (Thursday, 12 February)
- Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations Dan Connolly (Thursday, 12 February)

Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 12 February 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 10 February)

Re: HTML and XML Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 10 February)

Re: HTML and XML Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 10 February)
Re: HTML and XML Jeff Sonstein (Tuesday, 10 February)
Re: HTML and XML Michael(tm) Smith (Tuesday, 10 February)
- Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Rusty Harold (Wednesday, 11 February)
  - Re: HTML and XML Michael(tm) Smith (Wednesday, 11 February)
    - Re: HTML and XML T.V Raman (Wednesday, 11 February)
  - Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 11 February)
    - Re: HTML and XML Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 11 February)
      - Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 11 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Geoffrey Sneddon (Wednesday, 11 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 11 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Geoffrey Sneddon (Thursday, 12 February)
    - Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Wednesday, 11 February)
      - Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 11 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Wednesday, 11 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 11 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 11 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Friday, 13 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Ian Hickson (Friday, 13 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 19 February)
- Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 11 February)
- Re: HTML and XML Henry S. Thompson (Wednesday, 11 February)
  - Re: HTML and XML Michael(tm) Smith (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: HTML and XML Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 11 February)
- Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 11 February)
- Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Wednesday, 11 February)
  - Re: HTML and XML Geoffrey Sneddon (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 11 February)
- Re: HTML and XML Paul Libbrecht (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML Robert J Burns (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Sunday, 15 February)
- Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Monday, 16 February)
  - Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Monday, 16 February)
  - Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Monday, 16 February)
    - Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Monday, 16 February)
      - Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Monday, 16 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Monday, 16 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Monday, 16 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Monday, 16 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Monday, 16 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 17 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Tuesday, 17 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Tuesday, 17 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 17 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Tuesday, 17 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Paul Prescod (Tuesday, 17 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 17 February)
      - Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Monday, 16 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Monday, 16 February)
        
        Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Monday, 16 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Julian Reschke (Monday, 16 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Monday, 16 February)
        Re: HTML and XML Pat Hayes (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML Jeff Sonstein (Sunday, 15 February)
Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML Jeff Sonstein (Monday, 16 February)
- Re: HTML and XML Bijan Parsia (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 19 February)
- Re: HTML and XML Elliotte Harold (Thursday, 19 February)

Re: FYI: broken links in TAG finding uriMediaType-9 John Kemp (Tuesday, 10 February)

Re: FYI: broken links in TAG finding uriMediaType-9 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 10 February)

Category errors Jonathan Rees (Tuesday, 10 February)

Draft of minutes from 5 February 2009 TAG telecon for review Jonathan Rees (Tuesday, 10 February)

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-meta-01 Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 10 February)

Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Jonathan Rees (Monday, 9 February)

Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Dan Connolly (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Eran Hammer-Lahav (Monday, 23 February)
- Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Tuesday, 24 February)
  - Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Tuesday, 24 February)
  - Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 24 February)
    - Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Tuesday, 24 February)
    - RE: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Eran Hammer-Lahav (Tuesday, 24 February)
      - Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Tuesday, 24 February)
        
        RE: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Eran Hammer-Lahav (Tuesday, 24 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 24 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
      - Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Xiaoshu Wang (Wednesday, 25 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Xiaoshu Wang (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Xiaoshu Wang (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Xiaoshu Wang (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Thursday, 26 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Pat Hayes (Thursday, 26 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Friday, 27 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Phil Archer (Wednesday, 25 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Xiaoshu Wang (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Phil Archer (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Xiaoshu Wang (Wednesday, 25 February)
        
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Xiaoshu Wang (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Wednesday, 25 February)
        
        Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 25 February)
        Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Thursday, 26 February)
        Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: Richard Cyganiak (Thursday, 26 February)
        Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: Richard Cyganiak (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com (Saturday, 28 February)

TAG ISSUE-20: Error handling noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Monday, 9 February)

Mild tweaks to 'http' scheme description for HTTPbis Jonathan Rees (Monday, 9 February)

W3C TAG Finding "The Self-Describing Web" has been published noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Sunday, 8 February)

Re: W3C TAG Finding "The Self-Describing Web" has been published Dan Brickley (Thursday, 12 February)

Re: editorial: assorted noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Saturday, 7 February)

Re: editorial: unclear use/misuse of "link" (vs. "link to") noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Saturday, 7 February)

Representation = entity in HTTPbis Jonathan Rees (Friday, 6 February)

Approved minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Friday, 6 February)

URN duri and tdb spec updated Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 4 February)

RE: URN duri and tdb spec updated Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Thursday, 12 February)

TAG Telcon Agenda for 5th February 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 4 February)

Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Monday, 2 February)

RE: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 Paul Cotton (Monday, 2 February)
- RE: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Monday, 2 February)
- RE: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 3 February)
  - Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 John Kemp (Tuesday, 3 February)
    - Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 3 February)
Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 3 February)
Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 Henry S. Thompson (Thursday, 5 February)

RE: Link: relation registry and 303 Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Monday, 2 February)

RE: Link: relation registry and 303 Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) (Monday, 2 February)
- Re: Link: relation registry and 303 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 2 February)
  - RE: Link: relation registry and 303 Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Tuesday, 3 February)
    - Re: Link: relation registry and 303 Phil Archer (Tuesday, 3 February)
      - Re: Link: relation registry and 303 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 3 February)
      - RE: Link: relation registry and 303 Eran Hammer-Lahav (Tuesday, 3 February)
        
        Re: Link: relation registry and 303 Phil Archer (Tuesday, 3 February)
      - RE: Link: relation registry and 303 Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Tuesday, 3 February)
  - Re: Link: relation registry and 303 Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 3 February)
  - Re: Link: relation registry and 303 Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 11 February)
    - Re: Link: relation registry and 303 Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 11 February)

Re: Reminder: POWDER Document Suite: Second Last Call Working Draft Phil Archer (Monday, 2 February)

Re: Reminder: POWDER Document Suite: Second Last Call Working Draft noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Monday, 2 February)

Re: Introduction to URIs (was RE: WebArch introduction, sort of) Tim Berners-Lee (Sunday, 1 February)

Re: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery Jonathan Rees (Sunday, 1 February)

RE: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery Eran Hammer-Lahav (Sunday, 1 February)
Re: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery Phil Archer (Wednesday, 4 February)
- RE: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery Eran Hammer-Lahav (Wednesday, 4 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:33:50 UTC