Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49)

On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 12:43 -0700, Cullen Jennings wrote:
[...]
> PS. I'm working with linksys folks so you can do something like have a  
> few NASs in your home behind a full cone  NAT. ...

Thanks a bunch for giving the context that you're working in.

I see a lot of proposals and sometimes it's hard for me to
tell which end is up because I don't know what problem they're working
on.

I don't have any particular advice just now, but I hope to give
it some thought.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E