W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:08:51 -0600
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1235423331.7466.3022.camel@pav.lan>
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 12:43 -0700, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> PS. I'm working with linksys folks so you can do something like have a  
> few NASs in your home behind a full cone  NAT. ...

Thanks a bunch for giving the context that you're working in.

I see a lot of proposals and sometimes it's hard for me to
tell which end is up because I don't know what problem they're working

I don't have any particular advice just now, but I hope to give
it some thought.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 21:09:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:00 UTC