W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

RE: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49)

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:18:31 -0800
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8B62A039C620904E92F1233570534C9B0118C86E210C@nambx04.corp.adobe.com>
With a significant amount of pain, we changed the URI syntax to
accommodate direct IPv6 addresses, http://tools.ietf.org/htlml/rfc2732.

I'd think pursuing that would be a better approach than
adding a new URI scheme, if really some additional
syntax is needed (which sounds like it might not be.)


Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 18:19:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT