W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

Re: google supports on rel="canonical" ISSUE-27 rel-ownership

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:28:56 -0600
Message-ID: <499B2C18.3010800@aptest.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: www-tag@w3.org
You might also consider the @rel reserved word collection at [1], as 
specified in the W3C RDFa Recommendation [2].

[1] http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax

Dan Connolly wrote:
> I just discovered this:
> 
> [[
> Now, you can simply add this <link> tag to specify your preferred
> version: 
> 
> <link rel="canonical"
> href="http://www.example.com/product.php?item=swedish-fish" />
> ]]
> --
> http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html
> 
> 
> Perhaps worth updating the generic resources finding?
>   ISSUE-53 genericResources-53
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/53
> 
> It sorta goes against our advice on follow-your-nose and
> self-describing web, but I guess it's not new information,
> since we considered rel="nofollow" before.
> 
> ISSUE-51 selfDescribingWeb-51 well known formats and URI based
> extensibility
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/51
> 
> 
> 
> See also an HTML WG issue:
>   ISSUE-27 rel-ownership @rel value ownership, registry consideration
>   http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/27
> 

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 21:29:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT