On 2009-02-25 07:38, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> wrote: >> >> What is required is to define Content-Type in URI. Once we have these, >> not only Data/Resource are linked but DataType/Service. The best of >> all, it works within the conceptualizations defined in AWWW, and does >> not require any other ambiguous conceptualization, such as, IR, >> metadata, and description, etc. > > I consider on of the strengths of the semantic web layer is that it is > agnostic about the syntactic structure of URIs. I also think that > syntactically binding the URI of a resource and the URI(s) of its > representation(s) or description(s) is necessary, and would be overly > cumbersome in practice. Oops. Meant "is *UN*necessary" (hopefully that was obvious ;-) PatrickReceived on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 05:52:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT