W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case.

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:54:50 +0100
To: <wangxiao@musc.edu>, <eran@hueniverse.com>
CC: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <jar@creativecommons.org>, <connolly@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C5CAA9CA.DF2E%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>

On 2009-02-25 07:38, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> wrote:

>> What is required is to define Content-Type in URI.  Once we have these,
>> not only Data/Resource are linked but DataType/Service.  The best of
>> all, it works within the conceptualizations defined in AWWW, and does
>> not require any other ambiguous conceptualization, such as, IR,
>> metadata, and description, etc.
> I consider on of the strengths of the semantic web layer is that it is
> agnostic about the syntactic structure of URIs. I also think that
> syntactically binding the URI of a resource and the URI(s) of its
> representation(s) or description(s) is necessary, and would be overly
> cumbersome in practice.

Oops. Meant "is *UN*necessary" (hopefully that was obvious ;-)

Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 05:52:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:00 UTC