W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:52:59 -0800
Message-ID: <49A96BEB.1080702@adida.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:
> The Link Header draft proposes a single new registry (containing
> existing HTML and Atom relations) -- so no, this doesn't seem to be a
> problem.

Julian,

The registry doesn't/cannot change prior specs which specify that
@profile affects the value of @rel.

-Ben

Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:53:38 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ben Adida: "Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel"
Next in thread: Julian Reschke: "Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel"
Reply: Julian Reschke: "Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT