Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case.

On 2009-02-25 19:05, "ext Xiaoshu Wang" <wangxiao@musc.edu> wrote:


> ...  You need to define
> precisely to say what is "mis-use" and what is not.  Making blank
> statement is not helpful.

> Again, show a use case to demonstrate how optimal MGET is over Conneg.
> Repeating something doesn't make something true.

> ... What I am saying is that then Conneg for RDF-type does the
> same thing as MGET.  I don't need MGET to get RDF.

> ... whatever MGET do can be done in
> CN.  Then, please, make some concrete argument to justify your claim and
> show (1) something that MGET can do but CN cannot do. or (2) if both can
> do, why MGET is good or CN is bad in practice.

I have already responded to all of these points (some of them several
times). Please take the time to read my posts, and if you have any further
questions about anything I have said, please ask me in a private email.

Regards,

Patrick