Mark Nottingham wrote: > ... > 2) However, it seems like RDFa is jumping the gun by assuming @rel is a > CURIE right now. This is not promoting interoperablity or shared > architecture, because no XHTML processor that isn't aware of RDFa can > properly identify these link relations. My preference would be an > erratum to RDFa removing this syntax, replacing them with a > self-contained identifier (i.e. a URI). Thoughts? > ... Indeed. See discussion from last September, around <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Sep/0035.html>. BR, JulianReceived on Friday, 27 February 2009 09:49:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT