- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:49:02 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > ... > 2) However, it seems like RDFa is jumping the gun by assuming @rel is a > CURIE right now. This is not promoting interoperablity or shared > architecture, because no XHTML processor that isn't aware of RDFa can > properly identify these link relations. My preference would be an > erratum to RDFa removing this syntax, replacing them with a > self-contained identifier (i.e. a URI). Thoughts? > ... Indeed. See discussion from last September, around <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Sep/0035.html>. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 09:49:50 UTC