W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:38:14 +0100
Message-ID: <49945E86.7050301@gmx.de>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>, www-tag@w3.org

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> ...
> I'm sympathetic to the notion that citations to IDs should be as "work in 
> progress".  I must say I don't find this an even slightly compelling 
> excuse as to why the content should disappear when the draft becomes 
> obsolete.  As a member of the community who has been repeatedly frustrated 
> ...

I probably should have mentioned that I also think removing the content 
is the right thing.

Thomas R. already pointed out that tools.ietf.org has historic drafts as 
well, so my recommendation would be just to link there.

BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 17:39:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT