Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> ...
> I'm sympathetic to the notion that citations to IDs should be as "work in 
> progress".  I must say I don't find this an even slightly compelling 
> excuse as to why the content should disappear when the draft becomes 
> obsolete.  As a member of the community who has been repeatedly frustrated 
> ...

I probably should have mentioned that I also think removing the content 
is the right thing.

Thomas R. already pointed out that tools.ietf.org has historic drafts as 
well, so my recommendation would be just to link there.

BR, Julian