- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:38:14 +0100
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>, www-tag@w3.org
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > ... > I'm sympathetic to the notion that citations to IDs should be as "work in > progress". I must say I don't find this an even slightly compelling > excuse as to why the content should disappear when the draft becomes > obsolete. As a member of the community who has been repeatedly frustrated > ... I probably should have mentioned that I also think removing the content is the right thing. Thomas R. already pointed out that tools.ietf.org has historic drafts as well, so my recommendation would be just to link there. BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 17:39:02 UTC