W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data'

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:13:02 +0100
Message-ID: <499EC87E.4080401@danbri.org>
To: wangxiao@musc.edu
Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "timbl@w3.org" <timbl@w3.org>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
On 20/2/09 16:02, Xiaoshu Wang wrote:
> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>> Dear TAG members, Tim, Richard,
>>
>> Short version: an attempt to defined non-information resources without
>> using
>> non-information resource ;)
> I am not sure your proposal will work (see below). But here is the
> fundamental question: what is the purpose?
> Unlike if we know "x is a Human", we can infer that "x has (at least)
> one head", I wonder what more "x is an IR" tells me except "x is an IR".

I'm not a fan of the notion of IR. But here is a possible use case: 
digital preservation.

"A thing that is an IR, is a thing whose entire state can be serialized 
as a bytestream. Coupled with the use of standard names for agreed media 
formats, this gives us a solid foundation for digital preservation 
strategies. If it is an IR, we know we can preserve it by preserving the 
0s and 1s, alongside information aiding their interpretation. If is not 
an IR, we know that archiving 0s and 1s are insufficient to preserve it."
(OAIS is one rich methodology for maintaining such an archive).

This "IRs as bytestream-serializable things" reading is agnostic about 
whether non (web/http) IRs can be considered informational in some 
broader sense (eg. books, abstract intellectual works, and other FRBRish 
puzzles).

My story here ignores dependencies across resources, composite resources 
etc., but I expect that part of the story could be repaired. The main 
suggestion is that IRs are just digitally serializable things.

cheers,

Dan

--
http://danbri.org/
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 15:13:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT