W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:54:13 +0000
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C5BB2C05.1E4D%michael.hausenblas@deri.org>

Jonathan,

> I care about this too.
> ...
> I think the procedure is that the topic gets onto a meeting agenda at
> the chair's discretion, then at the meeting, after discussion, we
> resolve to create an issue.

Thanks a lot for this clear statement. I'll stand by and follow the
progress. Please shout out in case you need a hand ;)

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/


> From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:18:41 -0500
> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
> Cc: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context
> of the Web of Data
> 
> Michael,
> 
> I care about this too. We've been telling people that *all*
> co-representations, even exotic ones like turtle and XRDS, need to
> "say the same thing", without providing a piece of writing that
> explains why and with what normative force. I'll get it onto the
> agenda - or at least into the hopper for any discussion of TAG
> priorities.
> 
> I think the procedure is that the topic gets onto a meeting agenda at
> the chair's discretion, then at the meeting, after discussion, we
> resolve to create an issue.
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Michael Hausenblas
> <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
>> 
>> TAG members, Ian,
>> 
>> Honestly, I must admit that I'm a bit disappointed. I *thought* I've clearly
>> articulated my question (and I still don't know what is missing from my side
>> that I get clear answers - please let me know) and added a request for an
>> issue here. In my understanding both were not addressed/answered in a
>> satisfying way. I appreciate when a TAG member (thanks, Jonathan, this helps
>> me feeling a bit less lost) states [1] :
>> 
>> 'I'm as starved of citations on this subject as you are.'
>> 
>> However, I'd really like to hear from a chair or whoever feels responsible
>> if or how the TAG intents to address my question/issue.
>> ...
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 13:55:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT