- From: Mark Baker <mark@coactus.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:33:38 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>, www-tag@w3.org
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: >> >> ... >> I'm sympathetic to the notion that citations to IDs should be as "work in >> progress". I must say I don't find this an even slightly compelling excuse >> as to why the content should disappear when the draft becomes obsolete. As >> a member of the community who has been repeatedly frustrated ... > > I probably should have mentioned that I also think removing the content is > the right thing. > > Thomas R. already pointed out that tools.ietf.org has historic drafts as > well, so my recommendation would be just to link there. FYI, tools.ietf.org also provides "latest" links, e.g.; http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eastlake-cturi Mark.
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 18:34:14 UTC