Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> I'm sympathetic to the notion that citations to IDs should be as "work in
>> progress".  I must say I don't find this an even slightly compelling excuse
>> as to why the content should disappear when the draft becomes obsolete.  As
>> a member of the community who has been repeatedly frustrated ...
>
> I probably should have mentioned that I also think removing the content is
> the right thing.
>
> Thomas R. already pointed out that tools.ietf.org has historic drafts as
> well, so my recommendation would be just to link there.

FYI, tools.ietf.org also provides "latest" links, e.g.;

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eastlake-cturi

Mark.