W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel]

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:16:11 +0100
Message-ID: <49A803BB.6080801@gmx.de>
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, www-tag@w3.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Steven Pemberton wrote:
> ...
> As I said, a CURIE is an appropriate value for a rel in HTML4. In HTML4 
> the rel attribute takes CDATA, and is defined as a space-separated list 
> of link types, with no other definition of what a link type is. So a 
> ...

I'm not sure how this helps. As a consumer of a @rel attribute, I need 
to know whether I need to process it as CURIE before comparing it with 
known link relation names.

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 15:17:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT