W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

RE: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case.

From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:18:39 -0700
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
CC: "jar@creativecommons.org" <jar@creativecommons.org>, "connolly@w3.org" <connolly@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234127DD22FDB@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Both of which are included in my analysis [1] for the discovery proposal.

EHL

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-discovery-02#appendix-B.2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:45 AM
> To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
> Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; jar@creativecommons.org; connolly@w3.org; www-
> tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case.
> 
> Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> > ...
> > Agents which want to deal with authoritative metadata use
> MGET/MPUT/etc.
> > ...
> 
> Same with PROPFIND and PROPPATCH, btw.
> 
> BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:19:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT