W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel]

From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:41:50 -0500
Message-Id: <ED88802D-13D1-45B2-AF3C-10D3B60D0608@la-grange.net>
To: www-tag@w3.org
Hi,

Phil Archer said:
> HTML doesn't support namespaces and so shouldn't be using Curies  
> anyway. If people do, it may lead to unexpected results.


Some facts

* There are discussions going on about putting RDFa in HTML 5 (read  
here text/html and application/xhtml+xml) with or without CURIE.
   http://rdfa.info/wiki/Rdfa-use-cases
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Feb/thread.html#msg18

* There is an experimental build of html 5 validation with RDFa minus  
CURIE
   http://validator.nu/

* Documents served as text/html and containing RDFa prose are already  
post-processed by RDFa parsers.




-- 
Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
http://twitter.com/karlpro
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 12:41:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:12 GMT