ems versus pixels
test, please ignore
Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January)
CSS versus tables
A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities))
- Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities))
- Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities))
- Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities))
- Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities))
- Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities))
Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities
- Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)
- Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities
Fwd: Re: Multiple versions of a web page
Some questions from CHI-WEB people
Time response types and recommendations
auction sites (related to checkpoint 2.4)
20 December 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
Regrets
Jim Buck Jr. Goes to War?
Multiple versions of a web page
- RE: Multiple versions of a web page
- RE: Multiple versions of a web page
- RE: Multiple versions of a web page
- RE: Multiple versions of a web page
- RE: Multiple versions of a web page
- RE: Multiple versions of a web page
- RE: Multiple versions of a web page
- RE: Multiple versions of a web page
Regrets for tomorrow
[CSS-TECH] Action Item Update
Agenda
A single URI
Proposal for 1.5 success criteria
another approach... perhaps
UK National Autistic Society
Request to Join WAI Web Content Guidelines Working Group
happy holidays and new year.
regrets for 12/27, 1/3
regrets for 12/27
Proposal for 1.5 success criteria
- Re: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria
- RE: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria
- Re: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria
13 December 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
FW: Curl aims to replace HTML
Regrets for 12/20 and 12/27
regrets
form controls to the left or right of labels?
Agenda
automatic refreshing of pages.
Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units)
- Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units)
- Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units)
Accessibility and freedom of expression
tone as a guildeline?
- Re: tone as a guildeline?
- Re: tone as a guildeline?
[WCAG10 techs] Tables examples
Re: When to display alt + image
tooltips should probably be a user setting as a recommendation.
accesskey shortcuts.
form controls: acesskey shortcuts.
form controls: mandatory status
Foundation for text techniques
- RE: Foundation for text techniques
- Re: Foundation for text techniques
- Re: Foundation for text techniques
- Re: Foundation for text techniques
- RE: Foundation for text techniques
6 December 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
[TECHS-GATEWAY] Draft
The Culture of this group
Re: test cases
Agenda
title inclusion
- Re: title inclusion
- Re: title inclusion
- Re: title inclusion
- Re: title inclusion
- RE: title inclusion
- Re: title inclusion
- RE: title inclusion
Re: join the Web Content Guidelines Working Group
One more thing
Part 2 - Telecommunications Problems and Design Strategies for People with Cognitive Disabilities
Part 1 - Telecommunications Problems and Design Strategies for People with Cognitive Disabilities
"objective" clarified
- Re: "objective" clarified
- Re: "objective" clarified
- RE: "objective" clarified
- RE: "objective" clarified
last part of todays telecon
PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective"
minutes from 29 November 2001
Checkpoint 2.4 beta 3
Agenda
Thanks to the minute takers: Jo, Cynthia, and Charles!!
minutes from F2F meeting
Re: javascript and accessibility [scripts-TECHS]
Clear and simple writing
- Re: Clear and simple writing
- Re: Clear and simple writing
- text and other alternatives Re: Clear and simple writing
Checkpoint 2.4 beta 2
How do I/O devices relate? ?[tech-SCRIPTS]?
Tone
Re: Time Bounds-- Universal and User-Specific
Clear and simple writing
- Re: Clear and simple writing
- Re: Clear and simple writing
- Re: Clear and simple writing
Next WCAG teleconference
New member... and regrets for Nov.
Re: Minutes (finally) (fwd)
regrets for Nov. 22
Time Bounds - Universal and User-Specific
off topic? out of office
Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1
srcelement/target onfocus: device independence [scripts-TECHS]
PDF Techniques as technology-specific success criteria
regrets
[conformance techniques] How to connect to an EARL claim.
Re: Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1
- Re: Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1
- Re: Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1
- RE: Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1
RE: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man
FWAP: One More Thing
Deconstructing WCAG: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man
- Re: Deconstructing WCAG: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man
- Re: Deconstructing WCAG: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man
- Re: Deconstructing WCAG: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man
No Call today
[Scripts-TECHS] a few small adjustments, and came across a possibly new DOM document
[CSS-TECHS] Font Techniques Page Uploaded for WCAG 2.0 CSS Techni ques
Flowchart of dependencies of checkpoints
FW: Update to W3C Communications Recommendation
Fwd: Business benefits
phone notes from Melbourne face to face
[CSS-TECHS] Issues since 9/20/00
Attending the F2F by phone
Assistive TEchnology levels?
Comments/questions on Latest Proposed Minimum Def
Critera for the Minimum and Next up Set
f2f Required Readings
Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox "Beyond Accessibility: Treating Users with Disabilities as People"
Re: [meant for PF] "until user agents" and resource media diversity
"until user agents" and resource media diversity
[CSS-TECHS] CSS Properties by User Agent Tables Uploaded
RE: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properti es?
[CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties?
- Re: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties?
- Re: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties?
- Re: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties?
an index for every directory?
8 November 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
Regrets for tommorrow
Regrets for tomorrow
Agenda
FW: Re: Announcement: Next face-to-face meeting, 13-14 November 2 001
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Re: Business case suggestions
1 November 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
[CSS-TECHS] Notes from 1 November 2001 subgroup discussion
regrets
EO's document for review
[CSS-TECHS] Planning mtg for CSS-TECHS
Business Benefits of Accessible Web Design:
WAMO - 8 -
How not to get a good reaction from a webmaster
Reminder: face to face meeting registration ends on 7 November
Agenda
"Test Case for grouping of Links and whitespace"
.rpm file extension
W3C WAI WG room details. (fwd)
Client-side software requirements
[CSS-TECHS] In case you missed it in the minutes...
Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT.
- Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT.
- Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT.
- Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT (reformulated).
[theory: business models] add P to B and C player classes
Minor wording correction in October draft
upside AND downside and readily achievable measures
OTACS 2 and the WCAG 2.0 priority 1 definition
- Re: OTACS 2 and the WCAG 1.0 priority 1 definition
- OTACS 3 [was: Re: OTACS 2 and the WCAG 1.0 priority 1 definition]
Updated guidelines with open issues incorporated
Alternative proposal
Problems with OTACS-2
- Re: Problems with OTACS-2
- Re: Problems with OTACS-2
- Re: Problems with OTACS-2
- RE: Problems with OTACS-2
attachment for Accessibility of Online Services and Merchants for Deaf / Hearing-Impaired Consumers
Conformance Scheme OTAC -2
Consensus statement -- minimum set
25 October 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes
MSN.com
Regrets for today's call
regrets
First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
- Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance'
Identifying Accessibility Problems
Agenda
First thoughts on a minimum set, a secondary set, and several questions
W3C TR update
The Norman-Nielsen report
WCAG 1.0 checkpoints by relevant content type
FW: Call for review: Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility
Re: suggestion for WCAG checklist
FW: Combining Server/Client-side techniques for accessibility
- Re: Combining Server/Client-side techniques for accessibility
- Re: FW: Combining Server/Client-side techniques for accessibility
Action Item: Minimum checkpoint classification
apologies for dropout
Consensus Items
18 October 2001 WCAG WG minutes
Update and reminder: Other W3C work in progress
Agenda
Conformance Ideas Collection #2
RE questions of normative and informative in same doc
RE: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? MORE
FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy
- Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy
- Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy
- Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy
Regrets for thursday
regrets for Thursday, 10/18
Request to Join
Request to Join
RE: "are you ignoring me" email
Normative and Non-Normative - Why?
- Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why?
- Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why?
- RE: Normative and Non-Normative - Why?
- RE: Normative and Non-Normative - Why?
Are you ignoring me?
who understands "interface to policy setters" super-well
Re Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1
Re: Fwd: reporting scheme Re: conformance
Conformance claims - by success criteria?
- Re: Conformance claims - by success criteria?
- Re: Conformance claims - by success criteria?
- Re: Conformance claims - by success criteria?
11 October 2001 Minutes WCAG WG telecon
[CSS-TECHS] comments on WD-WCAG20-CSS-TECHS-20010716
Regrets -- At conference presenting at telecom time
apologies
WCAG meeting minutes, October 4, 2001
conformance
Agenda
Static pages are dead
Request to Join WAI Web Content Guidelines Working Group
Request to Join
FW: + info line reply to be shared
Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1
- Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1
- Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1
- RE: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1
Accessibility of Online Services and Merchants for Deaf / Hearing-Impaired Consumers
REMINDER
What's new (was Re: modem use limits)
Blind ballots
Request to join
Request to Join
Conformance issues with 1.0
Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts
- Re: Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts
- Re: Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts
- RE: Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts
C-6 Killed --- New C-6 proposed. R1-2 and N3-4-5 covered.
Regrets
ADD Comments from a D201 Student
Subject=FW:%20CONSENSUS%20REVISED.%20%20%209-28-01&In-Reply-To= <001d01c14b01$607c64a0$066fa8c0@750>
Required (at least Recommended) Reading
- Re: Required (at least Recommended) Reading
- Re: Required (at least Recommended) Reading
- Re: Required (at least Recommended) Reading