- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:58:35 -0800
- To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 11:02 AM -0800 11/19/01, Loretta Guarino Reid wrote: >Kynn, > >Aside from having some problems with the specific PDF modules you >included, there is a lot I like about this approach. I figured that would be the case -- I threw those in to say "hey, we could do modules about PDF" but I don't have the expertise to say what those modules would be, and on that I defer happily to you. >However, I'm a bit confused about the relationship between general >modules and technology specific modules. For instance, you included >both a module on abbreviations and on HTML abbreviations, with a >dependency noted. Is that the way to indicate a module which is a >technology-specific implementation of a more general requirement? >This seems to be a slightly different relationship than, say, the >Strict HTML's dependency on Valid HTML. Yes, I'm not sure about how to do this, which is why I gave various example of "how it could be done" with the intent to illustrate possibilities. I'm not sure I like how it came out exactly; I think some work on the "dependencies" is necessary, as well as specifically on the issue of technology-specific modules. That is why this is a rough draft. ;) On the issue of abbreviations, as I see it, there is a non-tech dependent way to do the checkpoint -- indicate abbreviations as we do in plaintext -- and a tech-dependent which is "use the ABBR tag." The two modules are meant to reflect this but maybe it is not clear. >This also seems to scatter technology-specific requirements, rather >than gathering them together in one place so someone using that >technology can be sure to catch all the requirements, and someone >who isn't using a specific technology can ignore the related >requirements. But this may just be a problem of presentation, not of >content. It probably is. :) However, ideally what you'd have is something using this approach to CREATE the actual policy which humans are meant to use, and that should be arrangable in any way desired. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 17:04:16 UTC