- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:49:13 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Summary of consensus and action items - Consensus item:There would be a minimum standard of accessibility. In order for site to assert any level of conformance, the content must meet this minimum standard that consists of predetermined set of checkpoints. /* GV has exact wording */ - Action WC: take discussion to ERT WG. How make statement for whole site vs. particular page vs. specific element - how do search engines discover. WCAG wants a scenario to show that it is possible. - Consensus item: Seems like a good idea to express conformance claims in a machine-readable form, but we aren't sure if we should require it of all claims or suggest it be used. - Action everyone: For next week - What causes something to be in or out of the minimum set? http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2001/10/18-minutes.html -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa /--
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 17:44:32 UTC