- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:18:18 -0500 (EST)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>, WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I agree, but in the development phase we run up against the same problems as the rest of the world - we have to figure out what to concentrate on first, and this group happens to work mostly in text. (I am sure we have more graphic talent in this group than we are seeing demonstrated, but since it is fairly time consuming to produce graphics I have not done a lot of trying to illustrate things which don't seem stable). I did try to illustrate 3.4 a bit as an example - the current version of the results are at http://www.w3.org/2001/08/mmcmn which includes sound and images, and tries to show that ideas can be represented in several ways at once. It probably does show that I am not a great graphic artist capable of communicating the idea perfectly, but then we haven't managed to commmunicate it perfectly to everyone yet so I don't feel so bad <grin/>. cheers Charles On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, William Loughborough wrote: At 06:25 PM 11/24/01 -0800, Lisa Seeman wrote: >pictorial representation should be provided of each instruction Saying this is hypocritical unless you *do* it in this very document. This would be the quintessential example of eating our own dog food. -- Love. EACH UN-INDEXED/ANNOTATED WEB POSTING WE MAKE IS TESTAMENT TO OUR HYPOCRISY -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Sunday, 25 November 2001 21:18:23 UTC