- From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:25:54 -0800
- To: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I would like to add the obvious one, that : 1, pictorial representation should be provided of each instruction, (if you can not do it in one picture, it is time to split up the instructions) 2, diagrammatic representation should be provided for relationships and flow of ideas. The subject could be shown at the center, with the various ideas radiating outwards. Branches and sub-branches indicate the hierarchical relationships between ideas, and visual cues are used to associate ideas with easily recalled symbols ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org> To: "WAI GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 10:44 PM Subject: Clear and simple writing > One of the breakout groups at the recent face to face in Melbourne (including > me, Lisa Seeman, Rob Pedlow from Telstra and Graham Oliver from AccEase) was > working on making text clear and simple, and how we could produce actual > measurable success criteria - without these there is no checkpoint. > > Although this is a tricky area, and the four of us aren't the world's > greatest experst, we came up with some ideas, which I have written up in the > following page: http://www.w3.org/2001/11/334-wcag > > I think that represents what we agreed on, but there is stuff that is missing > from that still. > > Cheers > > Chaals > > -- > Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 > W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 > Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia > (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France) > >
Received on Saturday, 24 November 2001 11:28:21 UTC