- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:33:08 -0800
- To: Joe Clark <joeclark@contenu.nu>, WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 09:26 PM 11/26/01 -0500, Joe Clark wrote: >* If WCAG 2.0 strongly encourages the addition of IMAT (the terms >"whenever possible" will work wonders here), lo and behold page authors >will actually do it. Right on, sister! One "strong encouragement" is for the WCAG itself to find it "possible" and that's what I meant by "eating our own dog food". All of the requested/recommended/required features being discussed *MUST* be included in the document itself - full stop! -- Love. EACH UN-INDEXED/ANNOTATED WEB POSTING WE MAKE IS TESTAMENT TO OUR HYPOCRISY
Received on Monday, 26 November 2001 21:33:12 UTC