- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@sonic.net>
- Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 07:31:32 -0700
- To: joeclark@joeclark.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi, Last week I ran some usability and accessibility tests on voting equipment that a California county is in the process of buying. One of the test subjects was a quadriplegic who voted by mouthstick. The other test subject was a blind person who voted by using audio output from the voting equipment and a number pad. Both were able to vote independently. The problem with a written paper ballot is that a blind voter can't review his/her choices like a sighted person can. Scott > >A friend just forwarded a note about a web-based secret ballot being > >developed for use in the US for the blind. > > I don't know why there has to be a special blind Web ballot. An > accessible Web ballot works for blind and sighted voters. > > >For most people, using a voting machine behind a curtain or marking > >a print ballot in a curtained booth is secret, but for the blind > >using these means, they must convey their intent to someone else in > >order to use them. > > That is not true. The last three elections I've voted in that used > paper ballots provided hard plastic templates that fit over the > circles in which you draw an X. A staffmember reads the names of all > candidates one after another. All you have to remember is which > circle to mark. You step behind the screen and write an X in that > circle. No one knows your vote. > > A mobility-impaired person has different needs, and the computerized > voting system I had to use last year was entirely inaccessible to > pretty much everyone who could not lean directly over a VGA > monochrome LCD and touch a single character cell with a very tightly > tethered special pen. But with paper ballots, there is no necessary > inaccessibility to the blind.
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2001 10:31:49 UTC