w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from October to December 2001 by author

Adam Victor Reed

• Foundation for text techniques (Friday, 7 December)
• Time Bounds - Universal and User-Specific (Wednesday, 21 November)

Al Gilman

• RE: A single URI (Wednesday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria (Saturday, 15 December)
• Re: Test Cases (distribution of; experiment design) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Foundation for text techniques (Friday, 7 December)
• when display ALT + image (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Tuesday, 4 December)
• Re: last part of todays telecon (Friday, 30 November)
• [conformance techniques] How to connect to an EARL claim. (Sunday, 18 November)
• Re: [meant for PF] "until user agents" and resource media diversity (Sunday, 11 November)
• "until user agents" and resource media diversity (Sunday, 11 November)
• RE: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properti es? (Saturday, 10 November)
• [technology - workarounds] Re: .rpm file extension (Friday, 9 November)
• [site logic] Re: an index for every directory? (Friday, 9 November)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (history, past and future) (Monday, 29 October)
• [theory: business models] add P to B and C player classes (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Sunday, 28 October)
• upside AND downside and readily achievable measures (Saturday, 27 October)
• OTACS 3 [was: Re: OTACS 2 and the WCAG 1.0 priority 1 definition] (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: FW: Combining Server/Client-side techniques for accessibility (Sunday, 21 October)
• who understands "interface to policy setters" super-well (Tuesday, 16 October)
• [ATTN: Chairs] relay service and telephone number in forms (Thursday, 11 October)

Andi Snow-Weaver

• Regrets for 12/20 and 12/27 (Thursday, 13 December)
• [CSS-TECHS] Issues since 9/20/00 (Monday, 12 November)
• Regrets for today's call (Thursday, 25 October)
• WCAG meeting minutes, October 4, 2001 (Wednesday, 10 October)

Andrew McFarland

• RE: CSS versus tables (Monday, 31 December)

Anne Pemberton

• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Monday, 5 November)
• Regrets (Thursday, 1 November)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: Feeling Ashamed (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: attachment for Accessibility of Online Services and Merchants for Deaf / Hearing-Impaired Consumers (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: The Norman-Nielsen report (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Action Item: Minimum checkpoint classification (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: 18 October 2001 WCAG WG minutes (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• RE: conformance (Saturday, 13 October)
• RE: conformance (Saturday, 13 October)
• Re: Conformance claims - by success criteria? (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Fwd: reporting scheme Re: conformance (Thursday, 11 October)
• RE: conformance (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: conformance (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: conformance (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: machine-readable claims Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: user needs vs author needs RE: Agenda (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: user needs vs author needs RE: Agenda (Friday, 5 October)
• RE: Agenda (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: Required (at least Recommended) Reading (Tuesday, 2 October)
• RE: Suggestion for List Posting (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: Suggestion for List Posting (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: Conformance (Monday, 1 October)

Annuska Perkins

• RE: Agenda (Thursday, 20 December)
• RE: regrets (Thursday, 13 December)
• RE: Agenda (Thursday, 6 December)

bill@eramp.com

• FW: Combining Server/Client-side techniques for accessibility (Sunday, 21 October)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: .rpm file extension (Wednesday, 31 October)
• [CSS-TECHS] comments on WD-WCAG20-CSS-TECHS-20010716 (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Suggestion for List Posting (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Required (at least Recommended) Reading (Wednesday, 10 October)

by way of Wendy A Chisholm

• "Test Case for grouping of Links and whitespace" (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Client-side software requirements (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: The Norman-Nielsen report (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Request to Join (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: conformance (Thursday, 11 October)
• Request to Join (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Request to join (Friday, 5 October)
• Request to Join (Friday, 5 October)

Charles F. Munat

• Accessibility and freedom of expression (Monday, 10 December)
• RE: Agenda (Thursday, 4 October)

Charles McCathieNevile

• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Monday, 31 December)
• test, please ignore (Monday, 31 December)
• RE: CSS versus tables (Sunday, 30 December)
• Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Thursday, 27 December)
• Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities) (Thursday, 27 December)
• CC/PP Re: A single URI (Thursday, 20 December)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 19 December)
• RE: form controls to the left or right of labels? (Monday, 17 December)
• Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Saturday, 15 December)
• RE: accesskey shortcuts. (Saturday, 15 December)
• RE: form controls to the left or right of labels? (Friday, 14 December)
• Re: form controls to the left or right of labels? (Friday, 14 December)
• Re: Can one use a keyboard to navigate and zoom within an SVG image? (Thursday, 13 December)
• Re: Can one use a keyboard to navigate and zoom within an SVG image? (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Tuesday, 11 December)
• Re: automatic refreshing of pages. (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: tone as a guildeline? (Monday, 10 December)
• [WCAG10 techs] Tables examples (Sunday, 9 December)
• Re: form controls: mandatory status (Sunday, 9 December)
• Re: The Culture of this group (Sunday, 9 December)
• Re: accesskey shortcuts. (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: form controls: acesskey shortcuts. (Saturday, 8 December)
• RE: "objective" clarified (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: "objective" clarified (Monday, 3 December)
• RE: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 2 December)
• Re: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective" (Sunday, 2 December)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.4 beta 3 (Sunday, 2 December)
• Re: last part of todays telecon (Saturday, 1 December)
• Re: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective" (Friday, 30 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Tuesday, 27 November)
• text and other alternatives Re: Clear and simple writing (Tuesday, 27 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Tuesday, 27 November)
• Re: Assistive TEchnology levels? (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: [conformance techniques] How to connect to an EARL claim. (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Monday, 26 November)
• [CSS-TECHS] issue 001225 (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Monday, 26 November)
• Correct grammar etc Re: Clear and simple writing (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Clear and simple writing (Saturday, 24 November)
• Re: Minutes (finally) (fwd) (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: Time Bounds - Universal and User-Specific (Wednesday, 21 November)
• session 2 notes Re: phone notes from Melbourne face to face (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] Notes from 1 November 2001 subgroup discussion (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: EO's document for review (Sunday, 4 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] Notes from 1 November 2001 subgroup discussion (Sunday, 4 November)
• Re: .rpm file extension (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 31 October)
• W3C WAI WG room details. (fwd) (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Tuesday, 23 October)
• WCAG 1.0 checkpoints by relevant content type (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: suggestion for WCAG checklist (Sunday, 21 October)
• methods for conformance claims Re: Consensus Items (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• RE: conformance (Saturday, 13 October)
• RE: conformance (Saturday, 13 October)
• reporting scheme Re: conformance (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: conformance (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: conformance (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: conformance (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 10 October)
• machine-readable claims Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: user needs vs author needs RE: Agenda (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Monday, 8 October)
• RE: Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: C-6 Killed (Friday, 5 October)
• user needs vs author needs RE: Agenda (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 4 October)

Christopher Atkinson

• In CSS, Scripting and Screenreaders When Does Invisible Mean Inaudible? (Tuesday, 2 October)

Clements, Sheree

• FW: Re: Announcement: Next face-to-face meeting, 13-14 November 2 001 (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Announcement: Next face-to-face meeting, 13-14 November 2001 (Wednesday, 7 November)

Cynthia Shelly

• RE: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria (Friday, 21 December)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Friday, 21 December)
• RE: A single URI (Wednesday, 19 December)
• RE: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria (Monday, 17 December)
• regrets for 12/27 (Saturday, 15 December)
• Proposal for 1.5 success criteria (Saturday, 15 December)
• RE: Agenda (Wednesday, 12 December)
• RE: Foundation for text techniques (Saturday, 8 December)
• RE: Foundation for text techniques (Friday, 7 December)
• RE: "objective" clarified (Thursday, 6 December)
• RE: Snippet for Re: srcelement/target onfocus: device independence [scripts-TECHS] (Tuesday, 20 November)
• RE: srcelement/target onfocus: device independence [scripts-TECHS] (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Regrets for tomorrow (Thursday, 8 November)
• RE: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Friday, 26 October)
• RE: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Thursday, 25 October)
• Regrets for thursday (Wednesday, 17 October)
• RE: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Wednesday, 17 October)
• RE: conformance (Thursday, 11 October)
• RE: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Wednesday, 10 October)
• RE: Agenda (Monday, 8 October)
• RE: Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts (Monday, 8 October)
• RE: Agenda (Friday, 5 October)
• Regrets (Thursday, 4 October)

Dan Brickley

• Re: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties? (Saturday, 10 November)

David P. Vandagriff

• Request to Join WAI Web Content Guidelines Working Group (Tuesday, 9 October)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• happy holidays and new year. (Saturday, 15 December)

gian@stanleymilford.com.au

• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Thursday, 20 December)
• another approach... perhaps (Monday, 17 December)
• RE: form controls to the left or right of labels? (Friday, 14 December)
• RE: Semantic-pragmatic (was Re: tone as a guildeline?) (Friday, 14 December)
• RE: accesskey shortcuts. (Friday, 14 December)
• regrets (Thursday, 13 December)
• RE: accesskey shortcuts. (Friday, 7 December)
• accesskey shortcuts. (Friday, 7 December)
• regrets (Sunday, 18 November)
• Flowchart of dependencies of checkpoints (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: Assistive TEchnology levels? (Wednesday, 14 November)
• regrets (Thursday, 1 November)
• RE: Problems with OTACS-2 (Monday, 29 October)
• Alternative proposal (Friday, 26 October)
• Problems with OTACS-2 (Friday, 26 October)
• FW: Call for review: Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility (Monday, 22 October)
• apologies for dropout (Thursday, 18 October)
• RE: "are you ignoring me" email (Tuesday, 16 October)
• apologies (Thursday, 11 October)
• conformance (Wednesday, 10 October)

Graham Oliver

• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 20 December)
• Re: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria (Monday, 17 December)
• The Culture of this group (Thursday, 6 December)
• f2f Required Readings (Sunday, 11 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties? (Friday, 9 November)
• Regrets for tommorrow (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT (reformulated). - Another go (Wednesday, 31 October)
• WAMO - 8 - Completed (Wednesday, 31 October)
• WAMO - 8 - (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT (reformulated). (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT (reformulated). (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: First thoughts on a minimum set, a secondary set, and several questions (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Thursday, 25 October)
• First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Identifying Accessibility Problems (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: Conformance claims - by success criteria? (Monday, 15 October)
• Subject=FW:%20CONSENSUS%20REVISED.%20%20%209-28-01&In-Reply-To= <001d01c14b01$607c64a0$066fa8c0@750> (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Request to Join (Tuesday, 2 October)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• Time response types and recommendations (Friday, 21 December)
• RE: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria (Tuesday, 18 December)
• RE: form controls to the left or right of labels? (Monday, 17 December)
• RE: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria (Monday, 17 December)
• RE: Proposal for 1.5 success criteria (Monday, 17 December)
• FW: Curl aims to replace HTML (Thursday, 13 December)
• RE: tone as a guildeline? (Tuesday, 11 December)
• tone as a guildeline? (Sunday, 9 December)
• RE: "objective" clarified (Sunday, 9 December)
• Test Cases (Tuesday, 4 December)
• "objective" clarified (Monday, 3 December)
• request and summary (Monday, 3 December)
• RE: last part of todays telecon (Monday, 3 December)
• RE: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective" (Friday, 30 November)
• last part of todays telecon (Thursday, 29 November)
• PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective" (Thursday, 29 November)
• RE: Clear and simple writing (Thursday, 29 November)
• RE: Time Bounds-- Universal and User-Specific (Monday, 26 November)
• Tone (Monday, 26 November)
• RE: Time Bounds - Universal and User-Specific (Wednesday, 21 November)
• RE: Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1 (Monday, 19 November)
• No Call today (Friday, 16 November)
• FW: Update to W3C Communications Recommendation (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Assistive TEchnology levels? (Monday, 12 November)
• Comments/questions on Latest Proposed Minimum Def (Monday, 12 November)
• RE: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT. (Monday, 12 November)
• Critera for the Minimum and Next up Set (Monday, 12 November)
• Consensus on "testable" + Proposition for "objective" (Sunday, 11 November)
• Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT. (Sunday, 28 October)
• attachment for Accessibility of Online Services and Merchants for Deaf / Hearing-Impaired Consumers (Thursday, 25 October)
• FW: Accessibility of Online Services and Merchants for Deaf / Hearing-Impaired Consumers (Thursday, 25 October)
• Conformance Scheme OTAC -2 (Thursday, 25 October)
• Consensus statement -- minimum set (Thursday, 25 October)
• RE: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Consensus Items (Thursday, 18 October)
• Conformance Ideas Collection #2 (Wednesday, 17 October)
• RE questions of normative and informative in same doc (Wednesday, 17 October)
• FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Regrets -- At conference presenting at telecom time (Thursday, 11 October)
• RE: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• FW: + info line reply to be shared (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Monday, 8 October)
• RE: Agenda (Monday, 8 October)
• Accessibility of Online Services and Merchants for Deaf / Hearing-Impaired Consumers (Monday, 8 October)
• When is a checkpoint N/A (Monday, 8 October)
• RE: Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts (Sunday, 7 October)
• Dont confuse consensus statements with Guidelines (Sunday, 7 October)
• REMINDER (Sunday, 7 October)
• Conformance issues with 1.0 (Friday, 5 October)
• Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts (Friday, 5 October)
• C-6 Killed --- New C-6 proposed. R1-2 and N3-4-5 covered. (Friday, 5 October)
• FW: CONSENSUS REVISED. 9-28-01 (Tuesday, 2 October)
• RE: Suggestion for List Posting (Monday, 1 October)

Harvey Bingham

• What's new (was Re: modem use limits) (Sunday, 7 October)

Jason White

• Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities) (Thursday, 27 December)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 19 December)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 11 December)
• Non-testable, normative requirements (was RE: tone as a guildeline?) (Tuesday, 11 December)
• Semantic-pragmatic (was Re: tone as a guildeline?) (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: tone as a guildeline? (Monday, 10 December)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 4 December)
• Re: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective" (Friday, 30 November)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 28 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Next WCAG teleconference (Friday, 23 November)
• Re: Deconstructing WCAG: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man (Sunday, 18 November)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Fw: Agenda (Thursday, 1 November)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: .rpm file extension (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Reminder: face to face meeting registration ends on 7 November (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT (reformulated). (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT (reformulated). (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT. (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: Minor wording correction in October draft (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: OTACS 2 and the WCAG 1.0 priority 1 definition (Saturday, 27 October)
• OTACS 2 and the WCAG 2.0 priority 1 definition (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: Alternative proposal (Saturday, 27 October)
• Updated guidelines with open issues incorporated (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Thursday, 25 October)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Agenda (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Conformance claims - by success criteria? (Thursday, 11 October)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 10 October)
• RE: Agenda (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Blind ballots (Sunday, 7 October)
• Re: Subject=FW:%20CONSENSUS%20REVISED.%20%20%209-28-01&In-Reply-To= <001d01c14b01$607c64a0$066fa8c0@750> (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 2 October)
• RE: Suggestion for List Posting (Tuesday, 2 October)
• Conformance (Monday, 1 October)

Jim Ley

• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities (Friday, 28 December)
• Re: CC/PP Re: A single URI (Thursday, 20 December)
• Re: CC/PP Re: A single URI (Thursday, 20 December)
• Re: A single URI (Thursday, 20 December)
• Re: A single URI (Thursday, 20 December)
• Re: A single URI (Wednesday, 19 December)
• Re: automatic refreshing of pages. (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Tuesday, 11 December)
• Re: When to display alt + image (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Foundation for text techniques (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Foundation for text techniques (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Can we have more information (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Saturday, 24 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Saturday, 24 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Saturday, 24 November)
• Re: [SCRIPT-TECHS] DOM-2 request for links or content (Saturday, 17 November)
• Re: Business Benefits of Accessible Web Design: (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT. (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: Consensus statement -- minimum set (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Combining Server/Client-side techniques for accessibility (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1 (Tuesday, 9 October)

Jim Thatcher

• RE: form controls to the left or right of labels? (Friday, 14 December)

Jo Miller

• Re: title inclusion (Tuesday, 4 December)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Saturday, 24 November)
• Re: regrets for Nov. 22 (Thursday, 22 November)
• phone notes from Melbourne face to face (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: 1 November 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] Test suites, font units of measurement (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Agenda-regrets (Thursday, 1 November)

Joe Clark

• Proposal for 1.5 success criteria (Monday, 17 December)
• Re: When to display alt + image (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Foundation for text techniques (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Thursday, 6 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Thursday, 6 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Wednesday, 5 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Wednesday, 5 December)
• title inclusion (Tuesday, 4 December)
• Checkpoint 2.4 beta 3 (Thursday, 29 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] issue 001225 (Tuesday, 27 November)
• Clear and simple writing (Tuesday, 27 November)
• Checkpoint 2.4 beta 2 (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Time Bounds-- Universal and User-Specific (Sunday, 25 November)
• Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1 (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1 (Sunday, 18 November)
• Blind ballots (Saturday, 6 October)

Joel Sanda

• [CSS-TECHS] Font Techniques Page Uploaded for WCAG 2.0 CSS Techni ques (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [CSS-TECHS] CSS Properties by User Agent Tables Uploaded (Saturday, 10 November)
• RE: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properti es? (Saturday, 10 November)
• [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties? (Friday, 9 November)

jonathan chetwynd

• Re: Can one use a keyboard to navigate and zoom within an SVG image? (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Can one use a keyboard to navigate and zoom within an SVG image? (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: awareness (Monday, 10 December)
• tooltips should probably be a user setting as a recommendation. (Friday, 7 December)
• Learning difficulties and the web (Tuesday, 4 December)
• Re: Telecommunications Problems and Design Strategies for People with Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 3 December)
• Re: javascript and accessibility [scripts-TECHS] (Wednesday, 28 November)
• How do I/O devices relate? ?[tech-SCRIPTS]? (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: off topic? out of office (Tuesday, 20 November)
• off topic? out of office (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Snippet for Re: srcelement/target onfocus: device independence [scripts-TECHS] (Tuesday, 20 November)
• srcelement/target onfocus: device independence [scripts-TECHS] (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: [SCRIPT-TECHS] DOM-2 request for links or content (Saturday, 17 November)
• [SCRIPT-TECHS] DOM-2 request for links or content (Saturday, 17 November)
• [Scripts-TECHS] a few small adjustments, and came across a possibly new DOM document (Thursday, 15 November)
• an index for every directory? (Friday, 9 November)
• Re: .rpm file extension (Wednesday, 31 October)
• W3C WAI WG f3f (Tuesday, 30 October)
• .rpm file extension (Tuesday, 30 October)
• A confession of professional incompetence was Re: Feeling Ashamed (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: MSN.com (Thursday, 25 October)
• adequate, testable, success criteria (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: The Norman-Nielsen report (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: Required (at least Recommended) Reading (Tuesday, 2 October)

jt13@hotmail.com

• Are you ignoring me? (Sunday, 14 October)

Judy Brewer

• Re: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective" (Friday, 30 November)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• Regrets (Thursday, 20 December)
• RE: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man (Sunday, 18 November)
• RE: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? MORE (Wednesday, 17 October)
• RE: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Wednesday, 17 October)

Kynn Bartlett

• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: ems versus pixels (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Friday, 28 December)
• Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities) (Thursday, 27 December)
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities (Thursday, 27 December)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 25 December)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 25 December)
• Fwd: Re: Multiple versions of a web page (Monday, 24 December)
• Re: CC/PP Re: A single URI (Thursday, 20 December)
• Re: A single URI (Thursday, 20 December)
• Re: A single URI (Wednesday, 19 December)
• Re: A single URI (Wednesday, 19 December)
• [CSS-TECH] Action Item Update (Wednesday, 19 December)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: awareness (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Accessibility and freedom of expression (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: tone as a guildeline? (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Foundation for text techniques (Friday, 7 December)
• RE: "objective" clarified (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 6 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Thursday, 6 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Thursday, 6 December)
• Re: test cases (Thursday, 6 December)
• Re: "objective" clarified (Thursday, 6 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Thursday, 6 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Tuesday, 4 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Tuesday, 4 December)
• Re: last part of todays telecon (Friday, 30 November)
• Re: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective" (Friday, 30 November)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.4 beta 3 (Thursday, 29 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] issue 001225 (Tuesday, 27 November)
• Re: Time Bounds-- Universal and User-Specific (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Timed Responses (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: off topic? out of office (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: Deconstructing WCAG: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man (Monday, 19 November)
• Re: Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1 (Sunday, 18 November)
• Re: Framework for Web Accessibility Policies (FWAP) 0.1 (Sunday, 18 November)
• FWAP: One More Thing (Sunday, 18 November)
• Deconstructing WCAG: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man (Sunday, 18 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties? (Saturday, 10 November)
• Re: Business Benefits of Accessible Web Design: (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: How not to get a good reaction from a webmaster (Wednesday, 31 October)
• How not to get a good reaction from a webmaster (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: Minimum Set = eliminate barriers with aid of AT. (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Sunday, 28 October)
• Biggest Objection to OTACS-2 (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Saturday, 27 October)
• Priorities in WCAG: Explaining the Problem (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Saturday, 27 October)
• Access Tool Requirements (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Saturday, 27 October)
• Feeling Ashamed (Saturday, 27 October)
• Nielsen Norman Report (Saturday, 27 October)
• RE: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: Consensus Items (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Friday, 26 October)
• RE: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why? (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: MSN.com (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Conformance Scheme OTAC -2 (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Consensus statement -- minimum set (Friday, 26 October)
• RE: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: Conformance issues with 1.0 (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: Consensus Items on User, User, and Author Conflicts (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: C-6 Killed --- New C-6 proposed. R1-2 and N3-4-5 covered. (Friday, 5 October)
• ADD Comments from a D201 Student (Thursday, 4 October)
• Re: Conformance (Monday, 1 October)

kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com

• Re: Conformance Ideas Collection #2 (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Tuesday, 23 October)

Lisa Seeman

• UK National Autistic Society (Tuesday, 18 December)
• Re: Semantic-pragmatic (was Re: tone as a guildeline?) (Monday, 17 December)
• Re: title inclusion (Wednesday, 5 December)
• Re: Telecommunications Problems and Design Strategies for People withCognitive Disabilities (Tuesday, 4 December)
• One more thing (Monday, 3 December)
• Part 2 - Telecommunications Problems and Design Strategies for People with Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 3 December)
• Part 1 - Telecommunications Problems and Design Strategies for People with Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 3 December)
• Re: Agenda (Monday, 3 December)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Wednesday, 28 November)
• FWAP (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Can we have more information (Monday, 26 November)
• Can we have more information (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Deconstructing WCAG: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: Business case suggestions (Sunday, 4 November)
• EO's document for review (Thursday, 1 November)
• Fw: Agenda (Thursday, 1 November)
• Business Benefits of Accessible Web Design: (Thursday, 1 November)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Sunday, 25 November)
• Re: Conformance Ideas Collection #2 (Friday, 23 November)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Regrets for tomorrow (Thursday, 20 December)
• regrets for 12/27, 1/3 (Saturday, 15 December)
• Re: form controls to the left or right of labels? (Friday, 14 December)
• 6 December 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 7 December)
• regrets for Nov. 22 (Wednesday, 21 November)
• PDF Techniques as technology-specific success criteria (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: Deconstructing WCAG: FWAP 0.1 Straw Man (Monday, 19 November)
• 8 November 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 9 November)
• 1 November 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 2 November)
• Semi-regrets (Wednesday, 24 October)
• regrets for Thursday, 10/18 (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Conformance claims - by success criteria? (Thursday, 11 October)

Marja-Riitta Koivunen

• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Monday, 31 December)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Sunday, 30 December)

Matt May

• Re: tone as a guideline? (Tuesday, 11 December)
• Re: FW: Revision to Web Accessibility Policy (Tuesday, 23 October)
• regrets (Thursday, 4 October)

Mirabella, Mathew J

• form controls to the left or right of labels? (Thursday, 13 December)
• automatic refreshing of pages. (Monday, 10 December)
• form controls: acesskey shortcuts. (Friday, 7 December)
• form controls: mandatory status (Friday, 7 December)
• RE: title inclusion (Thursday, 6 December)
• RE: title inclusion (Tuesday, 4 December)
• New member... and regrets for Nov. (Friday, 23 November)

Paul Bohman

• RE: Agenda (Thursday, 29 November)
• regrets (Thursday, 25 October)

Rhea Hughes

• Jim Buck Jr. Goes to War? (Thursday, 20 December)

Rowan Smith

• ems versus pixels (Tuesday, 1 January)

Scott Luebking

• RE: CSS versus tables (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Sunday, 30 December)
• RE: CSS versus tables (Friday, 28 December)
• CSS versus tables (Friday, 28 December)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Friday, 28 December)
• A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Thursday, 27 December)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 25 December)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 25 December)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 25 December)
• Some questions from CHI-WEB people (Saturday, 22 December)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Friday, 21 December)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Thursday, 20 December)
• Multiple versions of a web page (Thursday, 20 December)
• RE: A single URI (Wednesday, 19 December)
• A single URI (Wednesday, 19 December)
• Re: test cases (Tuesday, 4 December)
• Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox "Beyond Accessibility: Treating Users with Disabilities as People" (Sunday, 11 November)
• Re: The Norman-Nielsen report (Wednesday, 24 October)
• The Norman-Nielsen report (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Static pages are dead (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Blind ballots (Saturday, 6 October)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: Clear and simple writing (Saturday, 24 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties? (Saturday, 10 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties? (Saturday, 10 November)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] List of CSS Values cross referenced with Properties? (Saturday, 10 November)
• MSN.com (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Thursday, 25 October)

Slaydon, Eugenia

• RE: CSS versus tables (Friday, 28 December)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Thursday, 20 December)
• Request to Join WAI Web Content Guidelines Working Group (Sunday, 16 December)

Tim Noonan

• Minor wording correction in October draft (Saturday, 27 October)

Tom Worthington

• Request to Join (Monday, 15 October)

Vadim Plessky

• Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities) (Friday, 28 December)
• Re: A single URI (Thursday, 20 December)
• Re: A single URI (Wednesday, 19 December)
• Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Saturday, 15 December)
• Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Tuesday, 11 December)
• Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Tuesday, 11 December)
• Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units) (Monday, 10 December)

Wendy A Chisholm

• Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January) (Friday, 28 December)
• auction sites (related to checkpoint 2.4) (Friday, 21 December)
• 20 December 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Thursday, 20 December)
• 13 December 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 14 December)
• [TECHS-GATEWAY] Draft (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Test Cases (Wednesday, 5 December)
• Re: join the Web Content Guidelines Working Group (Monday, 3 December)
• minutes from 29 November 2001 (Thursday, 29 November)
• Thanks to the minute takers: Jo, Cynthia, and Charles!! (Wednesday, 28 November)
• minutes from F2F meeting (Wednesday, 28 November)
• Attending the F2F by phone (Monday, 12 November)
• [CSS-TECHS] Notes from 1 November 2001 subgroup discussion (Thursday, 1 November)
• [CSS-TECHS] Planning mtg for CSS-TECHS (Wednesday, 31 October)
• [CSS-TECHS] In case you missed it in the minutes... (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Problems with OTACS-2 (Friday, 26 October)
• 25 October 2001 WCAG WG telecon minutes (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Wednesday, 24 October)
• First thoughts on a minimum set, a secondary set, and several questions (Wednesday, 24 October)
• W3C TR update (Tuesday, 23 October)
• 18 October 2001 WCAG WG minutes (Thursday, 18 October)
• Update and reminder: Other W3C work in progress (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: Conformance Ideas Collection #2 (Thursday, 18 October)
• Conformance claims - by success criteria? (Thursday, 11 October)
• 11 October 2001 Minutes WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 11 October)
• Announcement: Next face-to-face meeting, 13-14 November 2001 (Monday, 1 October)

William Loughborough

• Re: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective" (Friday, 30 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Tuesday, 27 November)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.4 beta 2 (Tuesday, 27 November)
• Re: Clear and simple writing (Saturday, 24 November)
• Fwd: Business benefits (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: Attending the F2F by phone (Monday, 12 November)
• Re: Business case suggestions (Friday, 2 November)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: Updated guidelines with open issues incorporated (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: First Stab at Set of Principles for 'Minimum Conformance' (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: The Norman-Nielsen report (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Required (at least Recommended) Reading (Tuesday, 2 October)

Last message date: Monday, 31 December 2001 23:34:23 UTC