- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:43:26 -0400
- To: W3C Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Graham suggested the simplest compliance scheme - a minimum, and everything
else.
With that in mind, I'd like to suggest that a useful
classification of minimum would be the checkpoints that meet 1) hardware
variations for input and output and 2) content needs of large groups of
disabled folks .... the everything else would be the non-hardware related
needs of small groups .... and those that are easy to do or done
automatically would come "free" .... to those who want to count their beans
above the minimum ...
Hope I am suggesting this from a "user" standpoint, but suspect
that any users in the small, hard to accommodate groups won't feel included
....
....
Perhaps there could be "blue light" checkpoints - ones that affect
few people, are hard to do, and if you do them you get to put a special
symbol on your page, if of course, you have met the minimum first ....
Anne
Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com
http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 20:56:02 UTC